Many of my potential clients aren’t familiar with how a book or video life story is actually produced. They’re often quite surprised at the number of hours it takes to do a professional editing job. Over the years I’ve tried to explain the editing process using analogies that might create an “Ah Ha” moment for my clients.
If you’re reading this as someone who’s interested in having yours or someone else’s life story told, perhaps my analogies will help you understand the process. If you’re a personal historian, these examples might be something you can add to your kit bag of tools.
- The cabinet maker analogy: Editing is like making a fine piece of furniture. Let’s say you want an end table built. The cabinet maker you hire starts with the raw material, usually hardwood. She carefully measures and cuts the pieces according to a blueprint. The pieces are then assembled but at this point the table is still rough and requires sanding. The final stage involves using finer and finer grades of sandpaper until the table is ready for varnishing. Layers of varnish are laid down and rubbed smooth between each application. The result is an exquisite heirloom quality end table you’d be proud to display in your home. So too the print or video editor starts with the raw material of the interviews. After cutting them down and structuring the story she polishes the manuscript or video by refining the initial edit and then working on an attractive overall design.
- The gold panning analogy: I got this analogy from reading an interview with Studs Terkel, the famous American oral historian. He said that editing was like a miner panning for gold. The miner had to carefully sift through earth and gravel before he came up with some flecks of gold in the bottom of his pan. Like the miner, Terkel said he had to go through the transcripts patiently extracting the gems that were locked away in the interviews. It was a long and painstaking process.
- The symphony orchestra analogy: Editing is similar to composing a symphony. There are many different instruments all with their unique qualities and sounds. It’s not enough simply to write down a bunch of notes and hope that somehow a beautiful sound will be produced. You have to structure each section of the symphony so that when it is played it not only has a beginning, middle, and end but that it is harmonious and polished. Like a symphony, the editor pares away at the raw interview material and shapes it so that it to has structure and no extraneous notes and is beautiful to read.
If you’re a personal historian and have some editing analogies you find particularly helpful, please share them in the comment box below.
Photo by Jon Kneller
Stephen, the-freelance-editor // August 26, 2009 at 6:00 pm |
Brilliant analogies, Dan! In all my years of providing editorial services (and even going through the associated training), I can’t say that I’ve *ever* heard descriptions so accurate to the work or so relevant to the job. Thanks!
Dan Curtis // August 27, 2009 at 12:27 am |
@Stephen. Thanks for your generous comments. I’m glad you like my analogies.
Jim Taulman // August 26, 2009 at 6:24 pm |
Putting together a personal history is like making a cake. I have a Dump Cake recipe in which the baker just dumps all of the ingredients into the pan and sticks it in the oven. It’s good for the amount of effort put into it. However, that won’t work for the Hazelnut Crunch Cake with Marscarpone and Chocolate. Some elements in this cake have to be added at the right time or the cake will flop. Nor can one simply pull out ingredients from the cupboard and add them indiscriminately. To see the results of this, think back to a time a child decided to bake a cake for mother and made a mess of it by not adding proper ingredients. A personal historian is far more than a Dump Cake baker; a personal historian is a craftsperson who puts together a masterpiece that not only looks good but satisfies the desire for flavor of the person’s life.
Dan Curtis // August 27, 2009 at 12:25 am |
@Jim. I really like your analogy. Thanks for sharing it with us.
Rose Marie Morrell // August 27, 2009 at 4:16 pm |
Thanks Dan! These are great analogies to share. I have had several instances where people initially decided they didn’t want to “pay” for my services and then later came back and said, “After trying to do this myself I have decided that it will be worth every penny.” I always SMILE.
Dan Curtis // August 28, 2009 at 4:29 pm |
@Rose. Thanks for your comments. I can see why you always smile.
Shirley LaPlante // August 30, 2009 at 10:39 pm |
Dan – your posts are always so helpful and timely for me. This past week I had two potential clients that were reluctant to “pay up” because they couldn’t wrap their heads around the time investment. Fortunately, I was able to convince them of the priceless value of creating their history for posterity but your analogies will certainly make this task easier in the future. I so appreciate your work and helps to us personal historians! Shirley
Dan Curtis // August 31, 2009 at 3:56 pm |
@Shirley. Thanks for your comments. Glad I’m of some help.